Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
10
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
2016years UL94v-0 flame rate test report[2016/09/11]
-
Global Connector Industry[2016/10/29]
-
Turkey's plastics industry continues growth despite coup attempt[2016/11/16]
-
How can a battery catch fire?[2016/10/15]
-
?Samsung apologizes to Galaxy Note 7 customers[2016/11/09]
-
Apple's iPhone 7 Lands in Last Place in Battery Life Test[2016/10/04]
-
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Replacement Still Problematic? Users Complain Over New Battery Issues[2016/09/26]
-
How to stop your smartphone battery from exploding[2016/09/30]
-
Japanese battery maker TDK reels from Samsung Note 7 debacle[2016/10/12]
-
Plastic ban in voters' hands[2016/10/24]
-
Comparative Analysis: The cost of new power generation in South Africa[2016/10/22]
-
Video Microscopy Technique Reveals How Battery-Killing Dendrites Grow[2016/10/21]